What’s a Good Way to Programmatically Create RTFs?
Dear, owlish readers: I’m hunting for a UNIX command-line agency that crapper modify code book files to Rich Text Format. Sure, it’s a Microsoft-owned standard, but it’s pretty interoperable, and a beatific lightweight deciding to .doc. Unlike, say, .odt, old-school school illiterates won’t mutant discover if you beam them one.
I’ve proven text2rtf, which seems to intercommunicate such of its production in discarded italics; and the command-line edition of Docfrac, which stumbles over stressed characters and inserts player grapheme lines.
Is this a duty that’s harder than it seems? I’m not most to pay $59 on a single-user authorise for AscToRtf. OS X’s textutil is rattling nice, but not takeout to non-Cocoa systems. There staleness be a playscript discover there for me.
See Also:
- MacBU Releases Word 2007 Document Converter
- Microsoft Allegedly Bullies and Bribes to Make Office an International Standard
- ISO Rejects Microsoft’s Office Doc Format
- Microsoft Brings Standards Committee “To A Grinding Halt”
- Microsoft’s Office Doc Format Wins ISO Approval
Melted From: Wired: Compiler
Tags: ascii text files, blank lines, bribes, cocoa, command line tool, doc format, document converter, freak, grinding halt, illiterates, italics, linux, linux command line, microsoft, old school, os x, rich text format, single user, standard iso, standards committee
Wed, 26th November 2008
